FAQ
Last updated
Last updated
A: No, all calls to the Dfns API necessitate an API access key, which takes the form of a JWT (JSON Web Token), and must be provided in the authorization header as a Bearer token. This adherence to standard API security measures ensures that we validate this token for each request. On the other hand, we never possess the end user's signing secret (also known as “API credentials”); our role is limited to verifying generated signatures. This guarantees that even if there were a bad actor within our own system, they would be unable to impersonate an end user and steal funds.
A: Think of Service Accounts as analogous to a User Account designed for machine access. Similar to regular users, Service Accounts have individual permissions. On the other hand, personal access tokens are always linked to the user who generated them. They are incapable of having more permissions than their parent user, although they can have fewer permissions. If a user is disabled, all personal access tokens associated with that user are also disabled.
A: Think of Applications as the website or mobile app that will be calling Dfns APIs. When your organization is created, a default application will automatically be created for you. You should when you need to specify a new “expected origin” and “relying party”, which in most cases are simply the URL and primary domain of your app. These values allow WebAuthn to scope user credentials to the specific app so they cannot be used across domains.
A: Server Signed Applications require an application key pair to validate that all transactions are sent from the specific server in question. This is only required if you want to ensure it is not possible to send any arbitrary transaction from a client side application. We generally recommend using a default application type for simplicity.
A: the goal is for one Dfns User to register 2 different WebauthN credentials (passkeys) on separate devices (device A and B). The action to add a new credential, requires a User Action flow, which means the signature from an existing valid credential is required to be able to complete creation of a new credential. Let’s start from initial state: the end user is registered, and has an existing WebauthN credential on device A (Credential A). You will need a mechanism that allows credential A (on device A) to sign the user action challenge generated from the action started by device B (creating credential B). Theoretically, to achieve that goal, there could be a way that the whole flow happens on device B, and then when device B needs the signature from cred A device A, device A & B communicate directly via bluetooth / NFC / wifi or something... But that’s just theoric though, and we havent’t tried or tested, and that really depend on what the device will support. So the more practical approach, is rather to have this flow be orchestrated by your server, such as this:
Before the flow starts:
User has logged in on device A (using delegated authentication), so your server has the end user auth token gotten by Delegated Login, let’s call it authToken-1 (this auth token can be kept temporarily by your server, because alone, it can only be used for readonly operations anyways)
You have created 2 different Dfns Applications, with their corresponding origins used by WebauthN, here referred to as "App A" and "App B" (the origin registered on them will be something likehttps://your-app.com for a web-app, android:apk-key-hash:XXXXXXX for an Android App, or ios:bundle-id:XXXX for an IOS app)
Flow starts: User goes on device B on app B (a mobile app on mobile, or web/native app on a laptop). There, he may or may not be authenticated with your own auth system (up to you really)
From app B on device B, this user makes a request to your server to initiate the creation of a new passkey.
Your server gets that request. It calls Dfns API to create a challenge for the new credential (using Delegated Api Client initiated with authToken-1, the SDK method will be createUserCredentialChallenge, the endpoint reached is POST /auth/credentials/init). The Dfns Application used for this call can be App A or App B (appId passed to the Delegated API Client should be the ID of App A or App B)
Your server gets challenge-1 back from Dfns, and returns this challenge to app B, to be signed by a newly created webauthN passkey there (credential B).
App B creates a new passkey (Credential B) on device B, and signs challenge-1 with it. It sends the signed attestation and data to your server.
Your server initiates the user action flow, to sign the credential addition with the existing Credential A (using the Delegated API Client of the SDK, the method createUserCredentialInit, the endpoint reached is POST /auth/action/init ). The Dfns Application used for this call should be App A (appId passed to the Delegated API Client should be the ID of App A).
Dfns responds with a User Action Challenge (challenge-2). Your server forwards it to app A on device A, to be signed by credential A (eg if app A is a mobile app, you can show a push notification saying “do you confirm creation of new credential for device B ?“)
On Device A, user signs user action challenge (challenge-2) with fingerprint/face ID/ whatever webauthN supports there, and then sends it to your server.
Your server forwards this user action signature to Dfns, using the Delegated Api Client, calling the method createUserCredentialComplete (which calls both the POST /auth/action followed by the final POST /auth/credentials ). The Dfns Application used for this call should still be App A (appId passed to the Delegated API Client should be the ID of App A). This completes credential B creation.
From this point on, the user ends up with two devices, and one passkey credential on each phone
This sequence diagram illustrates this flow:
A: Key shares are encrypted and persisted in databases across multiple cloud regions and availability zones in T3+/T4 data centers. This geographic distribution helps to ensure reliable business continuity. We plan to decentralize this network further by contracting with highly secure, compliant and pre-vetted partners such as insurance companies, telecommunications companies, banks, private data centers, energy providers, etc.), to host key shares and sign transactions. This work is in progress.
A: No. A seed phrase directly recovers the private key, granting immediate and complete access to all assets. If the seed phrase is compromised, all assets will be irretrievably lost. In contrast, our customers maintain control over the end user recovery process. When a recovery is requested, an email can be sent to verify the user's identity. Additionally, the customer's administrative staff can receive notifications, especially if the wallet contains assets exceeding a predetermined threshold. Once a recovery is successfully executed, the wallet and all assets can be locked for a given number of days, ensuring that the original owner is contacted to confirm their initiation of the process. These measures collectively safeguard the end user from potential attackers and even their own mistakes.
A: Using the API signature endpoint, you can interact with any blockchain network. You only need to format the transaction on your side, then sign it with our api, and then broadcast the transaction + signature on the blockchain from your side.
A: On iOS you can set up an "associated domains entitlement" for the app to specify which credentials it can access as specified (Android details are ). You can use webcredentials and specify the origin you have in your application like:
Eg: `webcredentials:`
A: No. Firstly, custodianship is a regulatory status that can only be granted by local financial market authorities – it is not merely a philosophical concept. Secondly, the definition of digital asset custodianship, distinct from the traditional definition of financial custodianship, will vary across countries. For instance, in the EU under the MiCA regulation, custodianship is determined by the ability to move assets on-chain. In this specific context, Dfns does not qualify as a custodian since its employees lack access to key shares and cannot utilize the API to impersonate clients or end-users due to their inability to provide a valid signature. We are currently in the process of encapsulating our signers in to further ensure that key shares remain inaccessible, preventing collusion between root engineers who operate within the network partners. Lastly, it is important to note that custodianship is primarily defined by the contractual agreements between the key management solution and the client. The intentions outlined in these contractual agreements often hold significant importance for regulators, sometimes even surpassing the significance of technical controls and guarantees.
A: Users of Dfns wallets are never locked into the platform. They have the freedom to create a wallet using any other product or service and effortlessly transfer their assets out of Dfns using the API whenever they want. We also launched a in 2023 which enables our Enterprise plan customers to export private keys to their users.
